Groundhogg's Pricing Page

Groundhogg's Pricing Page uses direct-response style copywriting. The updates to this page have helped increase revenue by 80% since switching, according to the author of the page Pedro Cortes.

Unlock this teardown and 80+ more with a membership.

Become a member
Already a member? Log in
Groundhogg's primary value proposition is their flat-rate pricing. Instead of a plain "Pricing" headline, they opt for a headline that ties their value proposition with their pricing and positioning.
Their flat-rate pricing wouldn't differentiate from the competition if they simply left it there. Just naming their price or talking about price savings wouldn't be compelling without an illustration to compare. With this pricing table, the flat-rate pricing becomes far more effective.
They take it a step further by elaborating on why their flat-rate pricing matters. For visitors frustrated with the usage-based pricing model of their current provider, the "success tax" will resonate deeply.
Now the pricing structure is revealed. Their $40/mo plan is heavily favored with the "Most Popular" banner and colored button.
Since they don't offer a trial or freemium offering, they offer a money-back guarantee to remove the risk of signing up.
Visitors might perceive this pricing to be too good to be true. "What's the catch?" To address this, they explain why they chose feature-based pricing and how it's possible for them to offer it and still make sense financially.
Another major objection will inevitably be along the lines of "But I don't have the time or resources to get set up" so Groundhogg provides not one, not two, but five resources to accelerate activation.
Leaning into the ease of getting started, they elaborate on how painless a migration can be by showcasing a video testimonial of a customer. They also mention how visitors can get started by going the DIY route or hiring a certified partner to do it for them.
These testimonials are curated to support the value proposition of saving money and easily switching with the help of support.
These next testimonials are more generic and support the overall value of the software. You don't often see two testimonial sections back to back but, in this case, it serves them well to draw attention to a specific value proposition and then also illustrate support more broadly.
Normally FAQs should be avoided or minimized because the information can usually be integrated into the body of the page and void the use of the FAQ altogether. In this case, the page is already quite long and included all these minor details could dilute the effectiveness.
The page concludes by repeating the main value proposition introduced at the beginning and then summarizes the main supporting arguments as well.
Get a teardown just like this in your inbox for FREE, every week.
Thank you! Race you to your inbox?
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join the newsletter. We'll never spam you.

Related teardowns

You might like these too...